THE MARKETS When it rains it pours. People respond in different ways when they’re caught in a downpour without an umbrella or rain gear. Some walk as they seek shelter, others run. Occasionally, on warm days, people may celebrate the storm by dancing in the rain or stomping puddles. Last week, investors responded to a deluge of news and data in a variety of ways, making for a volatile week in the U.S. stock market. Here is a brief review of some of the issues they encountered: - Strong company performance continued. Overall, companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 (S&P) Index did very well in the fourth quarter of 2025. The Index appears to be on track to deliver its fifth consecutive quarter of double-digit earnings growth. In mid-February, the Index’s blended year-over-year earnings growth rate was13.2 percent, reported John Butters of FactSet.
- Slower economic growth due to the government shutdown. Companies did well in the fourth quarter, but economic growth slowed more than expected due to the government shutdown. “Gross domestic product rose at an annualized rate of just 1.4 [percent], according to the Commerce Department, well below the Dow Jones estimate for a 2.5 [percent] gain,” reported Jeff Cox of CNBC.
- Higher inflation in December. Last week, we learned that inflation accelerated in December. The personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index, which is the Federal Reserve (Fed)’s preferred inflation measure, was delayed due to the government shutdown.
| Headline inflation rate (PCE price index, year over year) | Core inflation rate (PCE price index, year over year, excluding food and energy prices) | | December 2025 | 2.9% | 3.0% | | November 2025 | 2.8% | 2.8% | | October 2025 | 2.7% | 2.8% | - Unabated uncertainty around artificial intelligence (AI). This wasn’t new news. Investors have been struggling to understand the outlook for artificial intelligence for several weeks. They’re concerned about how AI will change business models, and whether the capital being spent on expansion will deliver attractive returns, reported Rita Nazareth of Bloomberg.
- Supreme Court ruling on global tariffs. “The Supreme Court has ruled against the tariffs that President Donald Trump imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act…The president has responded, saying he will continue his tariff regime, using different legal authorities. A first step is a 10 [percent] global tariff, in addition to existing levies, he said,” reported Barron’s.
The U.S. stock market offered a bumpy ride last week, but major U.S. stock indexes finished higher. Yields on most maturities of U.S. Treasuries ended the week higher. | Data as of 2/20/26 | 1-Week | Y-T-D | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year | | Standard & Poor’s 500 (Domestic Stocks) | 1.1% | 0.9% | 13.0% | 20.0% | 12.3% | 13.5% | | Dow Jones Global ex-U.S. | 0.8% | 9.3% | 32.0% | 15.1% | 5.8% | 7.5% | | 10-year Treasury Note (Yield Only) | 4.1% | N/A | 4.5% | 4.0% | 1.4% | 1.8% | | Gold (per ounce) | 0.7% | 17.0% | 71.9% | 40.2% | 23.0% | 15.4% | | Bloomberg Commodity Index | 2.0% | 9.1% | 11.1% | 3.8% | 6.7% | 4.7% | S&P 500, Dow Jones Global ex-US, Gold, Bloomberg Commodity Index returns exclude reinvested dividends (gold does not pay a dividend) and the three-, five-, and 10-year returns are annualized; and the 10-year Treasury Note is simply the yield at the close of the day on each of the historical time periods.
Sources: Yahoo! Finance; MarketWatch; djindexes.com; U.S. Treasury; London Bullion Market Association.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. N/A means not applicable. A CHANGE IN LEADERSHIP. The Fed is the central bank of the United States. It is responsible for keeping the financial system running smoothly. In 2026, the Fed will see its leadership change. The current chair will retire, and former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh has been nominated to replace him. A new approach to monetary policy Mr. Warsh is a vocal critic of certain Fed policies. He has argued that quantitative easing (QE), which is the Fed’s practice of purchasing U.S. government bonds to stabilize the financial system, encouraged Congress to spend more than it otherwise might have. In an April 2025 lecture, Warsh explained: “In the 2008 crisis, we cut interest rates to near zero and sought new ways to make monetary policy looser and bring liquidity to illiquid markets. I strongly supported this crisis-time innovation, then and now. But when the crisis ended, the Fed never retraced its steps…QE – with some fits and starts in the 2010s – has become a near permanent feature of central bank power and policy. Fiscal policymakers – that is, elected members of Congress – found it considerably easier appropriating money knowing that the government’s financing costs would be subsidized by the central bank.”
Retracing the Fed’s steps One of Warsh’s priorities as Fed Chair may be reducing the central bank’s balance sheet, and there has considerable speculation about how this might be accomplished. Alex Harris of Bloomberg reported on several possibilities. These included: - Reducing Treasury purchases. The Fed ended its latest round of quantitative tightening (QT) in December because bank reserves (the cash banks are required to keep on hand to ensure the stability of the system) were falling too low, creating stress in the system. The stress became significant enough that the Fed resumed bond purchases.
“While restarting QT is unlikely, the Fed could gradually reduce the pace of T-bill purchases from $40 billion a month currently, or stop them altogether,” according to analysts cited by Harris. - Changing regulations. If bank reserve requirements were modified, the effect of QT on bank reserves could be reduced. “Regulators could relax the liquidity coverage ratio or internal liquidity stress test requirements, so lenders need to hold less cash,” suggested bank strategists cited by Harris.
- Exchanging assets. Another option is for the Fed to sell longer-term Treasuries and buy shorter-term Treasury bills, which mature in 12 months or less. “But without close coordination with Treasury, long-dated debt issuance needs and costs would rise significantly as the Fed retreats,” wrote Harris. One estimate suggested the change could push “borrowing costs up by 40 to 50 basis points.”
Warsh has expressed support for a more coordinated approach between the Fed and the U.S. Treasury Department, which could help mitigate the effects of Fed balance sheet reduction efforts, according to Ye Xie, Michael MacKenzie, and Maria Eloisa Capurro of Bloomberg. However, greater coordination could also raise questions about whether the Fed is acting independently. The Fed will face another significant challenge during Warsh’s tenure: managing monetary policy in an economy being transformed by AI. We’ll explore that next week. Weekly Focus – Think About It “Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.” – Winston Churchill, Former British Prime Minister
Securities and investment advisory services offered through Osaic Wealth, Inc. member FINRA/SIPC Additional advisory services offered through Novem Group and Osaic Advisory services. Osaic Wealth is separately owned and other entities and/or marketing names, products or services referenced here are independent of Osaic Wealth. Please see website NovemGroup.com for specific financial professional’s affiliation. Any opinions expressed in this forum are not the opinion or view of Novem Group or Osaic Wealth and have not been reviewed for completeness or accuracy. Any comments or postings are for informational purposes only and do not constitute an offer or a recommendation to buy or sell securities or other financial instruments. Readers should conduct their own review and exercise judgment prior to investing. Investments are not guaranteed, involve risk, may result in a loss of principal, and are not suitable for all types of investors. Past performance does not guarantee future results. (10/24) * These views are those of Carson Group Coaching, and not the presenting Representative or the Representative’s Broker/Dealer, and should not be construed as investment advice.
* This newsletter was prepared by Carson Group Coaching. Carson Group Coaching is not affiliated with the named broker/dealer.
* Government bonds and Treasury Bills are guaranteed by the U.S. government as to the timely payment of principal and interest and, if held to maturity, offer a fixed rate of return and fixed principal value. However, the value of fund shares is not guaranteed and will fluctuate.
* Corporate bonds are considered higher risk than government bonds but normally offer a higher yield and are subject to market, interest rate and credit risk as well as additional risks based on the quality of issuer coupon rate, price, yield, maturity, and redemption features.
* The Standard & Poor’s 500 (S&P 500) is an unmanaged group of securities considered to be representative of the stock market in general. You cannot invest directly in this index.
* All indexes referenced are unmanaged. Unmanaged index returns do not reflect fees, expenses, or sales charges. Index performance is not indicative of the performance of any investment.
* The Dow Jones Global ex-U.S. Index covers approximately 95% of the market capitalization of the 45 developed and emerging countries included in the Index.
* The 10-year Treasury Note represents debt owed by the United States Treasury to the public. Since the U.S. Government is seen as a risk-free borrower, investors use the 10-year Treasury Note as a benchmark for the long-term bond market.
* Gold represents the afternoon gold price as reported by the London Bullion Market Association. The gold price is set twice daily by the London Gold Fixing Company at 10:30 and 15:00 and is expressed in U.S. dollars per fine troy ounce.
* The Bloomberg Commodity Index is designed to be a highly liquid and diversified benchmark for the commodity futures market. The Index is composed of futures contracts on 19 physical commodities and was launched on July 14, 1998.
* The DJ Equity All REIT Total Return Index measures the total return performance of the equity subcategory of the Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) industry as calculated by Dow Jones.
* Yahoo! Finance is the source for any reference to the performance of an index between two specific periods.
* Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice and are not intended as investment advice or to predict future performance.
* Economic forecasts set forth may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.
* Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal.
* You cannot invest directly in an index.
* Stock investing involves risk including loss of principal.
* Consult your financial professional before making any investment decision. Sources: |
